Look at a snippet of their “conversation” – they are hardly speaking in a language, let alone developing one. Alice: balls have zero to me to me to me to me to me to me to me to me to Bob: you i everything else . Several publications called the programs “creepy.” Some journalists implied Facebook yanked the plug before, presumably, some kind of super-intelligence reared its head. The UK's Sun newspaper demanded to know: "Are machines taking over? The few bright spots that do exist in my memory, though, revolve around the three essential pillars: television, books, and AOL Instant Messenger. There were few things as satisfying as logging on to AIM and finding a Buddy List populated with the dorky screen names of dozens of my friends.
Specifically, the data scientists were trying to get the programs to barter over objects.
But these are just statistical models, the same as those that Google uses to play board games or that your phone uses to make predictions about what word you’re saying in order to transcribe your messages.
Zachary Lipton, an incoming assistant professor of machine learning at Carnegie Mellon University in the US, told The Register this week: “The work is interesting.
The days of Smarter Child are over, but chatbots are alive and well – perhaps more literally than ever.
Whether you’re aware of it or not, you’ve probably encountered a bot as recently as the last time you shopped online, swiped right on Tinder, or used an app like Facebook Messenger. The future of artificial intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among programmers.